review of "code is law"chapt-1

In spring 1989 communism in Europe eventually died .it was seined not by war but by politics
Writer says ,that had been a constitutionalist and was teaching in university of Chicago and had a very tough time those days as Chicago was devoted as center for studying emerging of new coming democracies.
Similarly central Europe was having people that were appointed to satisfy the bundles of questions being asked by outer world Communists and reporters. But their main mission was to watch transactions of people’s thoughts. This era was pathetic.
It would be handled by time not by government laws but I am sorry to say this also could not happen as a result many people were killed on United States streets and many old institutions were broken down.
Only a decade ago a new society was created by some liberals, students and universities it was liberal society. Any one could say any thing that he wants, it was the INTERNET. like an example see this


But this political regime also took control of it also very insulting manner.
I personally always tried to say my students and people to be liberal. in my teaching respect of laws is also taught .They often ask why cyberspace is having unlearned prohibitions for that I had no answer ever. Laws are made to facilitate, to prevent ones personal, national identity not to over take it
The concept of the dialectic has been around for a long time. It is simply that of opposite positions: Thesis (position) vs. Antithesis (opposite position). In traditional logic, if my thesis was true, then all other positions were by definition untrue. For example, if my thesis is 2 + 2 = 4, then all other answers (antithesis) are false. George W.F. Hegel, the nineteenth century German philosopher, turned that concept upside down by equalizing Thesis and Antithesis. All things are now relative. There is no such thing as absolute truth to be found anywhere. Instead, “truth” is found in Synthesis, a compromise of Thesis and Antithesis. This is the heart and soul of the consensus process.
Socialist/communist public officials were been forcing mind-bending techniques upon local ‘s controls like police, and training the rookies for a militarized communist replacement for our former law enforcement system. This book will deal with the point of liberty and with ones that wants not this.
Copy rights took creativity as Who can sue, and the remedies, remain pretty much the same. However, conversion damages will be abolished; delivery up of equipment will be restricted to infringers in possession or control knowing or having reason to believe infringing copies were to be made with such equipment. In relation to infringers in possession of infringing copies or equipment, copyright owners will henceforth be restricted to a time limit of six years in which to make their applications. In addition, copyright owners will be able to ask the court to order infringing copies to be destroyed, rather than delivered up to them or their own use. New and clearer powers will also be given to enable civil courts to authorise seizure of infringing copies and equipment, so long as force is not used, the local police station is notified, and a notice is left on the premises - not, however, in relation to business premises.
On page 6 is written that our code will do it. we can built or architect. Greatest blunder here is that promesis of every thing are made but little steps are under taken